Sunday, February 17, 2013

Prompt #3 (Revised)




2008. In a literary work, a minor character, often known as a foil, possesses traits that emphasize, by contrast or comparison, the distinctive characteristics and qualities of the main character. For example, the ideas or behavior of a minor character might be used to highlight the weaknesses or strengths of the main character. 
Choose a novel or play in which a minor character serves as a foil for the main character. Then write an essay in which you analyze how the relation between the minor character and the major character illuminates the meaning of the work.

In Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, Bernard serves as a foil to Biff which highlights the themes of denial and the failure of the American Dream.  Bernard works hard as a teenager and grows up to be a success while Biff coasts off of his personality and popularity and grows up to be a lost, wandering soul without real employment. 

Denial is a major theme within the work, as all the characters struggle to cope with reality.  Willy, Biff's father, raises Biff to believe that personality is everything in the world and that all things will fall into place if one has the right personality/relationships.  As a result, when Biff is a teenager, he does poorly in school and fails to graduate.  Willy denies Biff's faults instead of teaching him to do the right thing.  For example, when Willy encourages Biff to steal or when he tells Biff to cheat on his exams.  Bernard, the foil, does not receive the same kind of unconditional encouragement and is forced to work hard in order to succeed.  However, this good work ethic makes him successful as an adult.  The stark contrast between Biff and Bernard leads the reader into questioning why they are so different. This highlights the theme of denial as the reader realizes Willy's problem with denial led him to raise Biff as the foil to Bernard.  Biff and Bernard's differences continue to highlight denial as Willy also questions them, never acknowledging it was his own fault.   

The American Dream is a major theme in the work, highlighted by Biff and Bernard as Bernard is the poster child of the American Dream while Biff is the complete opposite.  Bernard is a very successful lawyer who earned his worth in the world through his trade.  Biff cannot find happiness in white-collar, professional work, so he has trouble holding a job.  The American Dream as represented in the play is that anyone can go into the world of professionals and climb their way to the top.  The American Dream fails Biff because he has no desire to take a professional job, instead wanting to work on a farm, so he can't hold a job or find "success" as defined by the American Dream.  The failure of the American Dream and Arthur Miller's message that it is not for everyone is highlighted by the differences between Biff and Bernard.  As the reader looks for an explanation for their differences they can see that Bernard finds extreme success through the American Dream while Biff suffers.  

Overall, Death of a Salesman is able to emphasize it's themes and meaning through it's use of foils Biff and Bernard.  The reader unconsciously answers questions and as a result understands the meaning of the play.

3 comments:

  1. You did a good job removing the Willy-centrism pointed out by Brianna and Julie on the original. One sentence could still be changed a bit if you want, but it wouldn't be necessary: "For example, when Willy encourages Biff to steal or when he tells Biff to cheat on his exams." You could use passive voice here; specifying Willy as the agent of the sentence sorta takes the emphasis off Biff.

    There's one other sentence that I don't like: "...led him to raise Biff as the foil to Bernard." Willy's intent was obviously not to raise Biff as Bernard's foil, but to raise him in a way such that he happens to be Bernard's foil. Your wording assumes common sense on the part of the reader, but unfortunately we aren't allotted any "you know what I means" on the exam.

    Solid essay, all I wound up doing was proofreading instead of critiquing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post, Santos! I thoroughly enjoyed reading it and I'm glad you chose a play that we are all very familiar with. I think you did a good job of analyzing the complex meanings of the text while answering every part of the prompt. In addition, the changes from the original to your new one revealed the clarity of your thought process. If I had to criticize anything, I would say that the strength of your writing drops off a little in your conclusion.
    I also wonder if, in your first body paragraph, you could have focused less on how their parents influenced them and more on their contrasting work ethics because Biff and Bernard had no control over who their parents were. Maybe instead of saying that their parents influenced them, you could have said that instead of learning from his dad's mistakes, Biff makes the same ones. On the other hand, Bernard works even harder to make something of himself when he could have just petered off without the help of his dad. Just something to think about. You did a fantastic job on this post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Matt as far as the fact that you did a great job removing all of the Willy references in the essay to focus more on Biff and Bernard. I think you could maybe improve it a bit further by making the same type of changes with The American Dream in the third paragraph as you made with Willy in the second paragraph. By this I mean that it seems the American Dream is the focus of your third paragraph, and this distracts from the Biff/Bernard contrast. You could trying saying something like "Biff and Bernard's contrasting upbringings are shown in the motif of the American Dream" instead of "The American Dream is a major theme in the work, highlighted by Biff and Bernard as Bernard is the poster child of the American Dream while Biff is the complete opposite". That's very picky, however, as this is a great essay.

    ReplyDelete